![]() |
For over 25 years the leading pallet and sawmill magazine in America. |
|
|
|
International
Pest Management/Wood Packaging – Packaging User Pest Management Issue History Recent
outbreaks of pests have been traced back to transport packaging, which has led
governments around the world to start cracking down on solid wood packaging
including pallets and crates. Numerous countries have established restrictions
to stop the introduction of foreign pests, creating a complicated maze of
regulations. The United Nations has stepped in to create one global standard. It
will only apply to packaging made with solid lumber not engineered wood products
(plywood, OSB, etc.) or corrugated. The
European Union (EU) has developed emergency requirements to prevent the spread
of the pinewood nematode to Europe. The EU measures impact coniferous,
non-manufactured wood packaging including pallets, crates and dunnage exported
from the United States, Canada, Japan and China. The EU started to implement
these restrictions on Oct. 1, 2001. However, the level of implementation and
timing is left up to each member country. Affected packaging must be properly
treated and marked. Impact on Packaging Users The
standard will likely increase the cost of wood pallets for international
shipment, create a new classification of international pallet, and require
additional paperwork for everyone involved. Some packaging users may switch to
non-SWPM to avoid border delays. Be aware that the European Union started in
October of 2001 to implement emergency measures for coniferous SWPM. A global
standard governing all SWPM (both coniferous and non-coniferous) will likely be
approved on March of 2002 and slowly implemented worldwide over a 2-3 year
timeframe. Action Steps Evaluate
your international transport packaging needs and consider your options.
Designate someone in your company to study the issue and how it will impact your
export packaging. Discuss the pending standards with packaging suppliers. Below
is a question and answers fact sheet for the international pest issue. The
information is divided into two sections - the global standard and the EU
emergency measures. Global Standard 1.)
What is the international standard and who is responsible for creating it? The
International Plant Protection Organization (IPPO), a division with the United
Nations, has finalized a proposed standard that would require all solid wood
packaging (both coniferous and non-coniferous) to be treated and marked.
Treatment methods include kiln drying, heat treatment, chemical pressure
impregnation and fumigation with methyl bromide. The international standard sets
specific treatment requirements. For example, heat treated lumber/packaging must
be heated at the core to 56 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. Implementation of
the IPPO standard will take place over a couple of year period as each member
country develops its own procedures. 2.)
When will the international standard take effect? The
international standard will be voted on at the IPPC’s meeting at the end of
March 2002. According to U.S. government officials, it will likely be adopted.
Implementation would then be left up to each member country. Realistically, most
countries will take 1-2 years to implement the standard if not longer. However,
some countries in Europe may be more aggressive in implementing the standard. 3.)
Will third world countries have the same restrictions as industrialized
countries? The
global standard will impact all IPPC member countries including some third world
nations. Realistically, poorer countries will not be able to comply as quickly
as industrialized nations. Thus, third world countries may be given more time to
comply. These details will be negotiated country to country. 4.)
What treatment methods will be acceptable? The
international standard allows for various treatment methods including kiln
drying, heat treatment, chemical pressure impregnation and fumigation. The
preferred method is heat treatment to 56 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. This
can be achieved by using a dry kiln or any other approved heat treatment
chamber. In some cases, fumigation or chemical pressure impregnation or other
treatment methods will be allowed as long as the importing country approves.
However, experts stress that fumigation will become the exception, not the rule.
The primary chemical used in fumigation is methyl bromide, which has been banned
for many applications by the Montreal Protocol because it is an ozone depleting
substance. 5.)
Are engineered wood products covered by the global standard? The
proposed global standard only impacts packaging using solid lumber (both
coniferous and non-coniferous). Engineered wood products such as corrugated,
plywood, OSB, etc. are exempt. 6.)
How will the standard impact the lumber and pallet markets? The
heat treatment requirement creates an opportunity for coniferous lumber to grab
more of the pallet market because a significant amount of coniferous pallet
lumber is already kiln dried and therefore meets the heat treatment standard.
But it is still too early to tell how drastic any market changes will be. The
new international standards will require the industry to change practices and
add lumber treatment capacity. Many countries, including the United States, lack
the kiln capacity to handle the coming demand for treated pallet lumber. There
may be a supply shortage if the proposed regulations go through and are strictly
enforced. 7.)
Should we switch to material other than solid wood for our packaging? In
most cases, solid wood pallets remain a viable if not the best option for
international transit. You must factor in much more than just the bug export
issue. Even treated, marked wood pallets will remain cost competitive compared
to most alternatives. Corrugated pallets may be a sound option for some
shipments (especially air freight) where water and moisture damage is not a
significant concern. Most plastic pallets will remain too expensive for one-way
use. Pallets made from engineered lumber products may work for some
applications. But these engineered products can be expensive and have drawbacks
as well.
EU Emergency Measures
1.) Do the EU emergency measures apply to both coniferous and non-coniferous solid wood packaging? The
EU emergency measures apply only to solid wood coniferous packaging. All
coniferous solid wood packaging must be marked and treated. If a pallet contains
both coniferous and non-coniferous lumber, the coniferous material must be
treated while the non-coniferous lumber does not.
For pallets that contain both coniferous and non-coniferous lumber, the
American Lumber Standards Committee (ALSC) and the U.S. government have
developed a mark that allows companies to only have to treat the coniferous
lumber in the pallet. This mark is available through any of the accredited
grading agencies under the ALSC guideline. 2.) Do engineered wood products or corrugated packaging fall under the EU emergency restrictions? The
EU requirements exempt engineered wood products including plywood, particle
board, oriented strand board, venner, corrugated ,etc because they do not carry
pests. The processes used to manufacture these products kill any pest that may
be living in the original wood fiber. 3.) What exactly has to be marked and how? There
has been some confusion related to what does and does not have to be marked and
treated. Non-coniferous (hardwood) lumber in pallets does not have to be treated
even if a pallet contains some coniferous (softwood) lumber. Initially, the U.S.
government did require all the material in a pallet containing both coniferous
and non-coniferous lumber to be treated if it carried the treatment mark.
Industry organizations succeeded in working with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture to change this policy. For pallets that contain both coniferous and
non-coniferous lumber, the American Lumber Standards Committee (ALSC) and the
U.S. government have developed a mark that allows companies to only have to
treat the coniferous lumber in the pallet. The non-coniferous lumber in a mixed
pallet does not have to be treated. This mark is available through any of the
accredited grading agencies under the ALSC guideline. Also,
the U.S. government has developed a mark for pallets treated with fumigation or
chemical pressure impregnation. There is no enforcement authority or
accreditation process through the ALSC for these two marks. However, the EU does
require that a licensed applicator be used. To ensure tracking ability, the
marks require the license number of the fumigator or CPI applicator.
The
National Wooden Pallet & Container Association (NWPCA) has developed a mark
for hardwood pallets. The hardwood mark is used for pallets that do not have any
coniferous components in it. There is no enforcement authority behind this mark.
It is used primarily to help border authorities distinguish non-coniferous and
coniferous packaging. You will be responsible for making your own stencil based
on the NWPCA guidelines. The U.S. government has approved the NWPCA hardwood
mark and is encouraging the European Union to accept it. The
only real issue that is left up to debate at this point is what does and does
not have to be marked. Currently, coniferous lumber (each board) used to
manufacture solid wood packaging must be marked once it is treated. If treated
lumber then moves from the original sawmill to a remanufacturer, the
remanufactured lumber (each board) must also carry the treatment mark. Then the
packaging manufacture must mark the packaging (two outside faces) with the
appropriate treatment mark before it can be used for export to Europe. If the
lumber is manufactured, remanufactured and then used to produce packaging all by
one company at one location, then the individual boards do not have to carry the
treatment mark. Once treated lumber is transported from one location to another
(even if it is all handled by one company) then the individual boards must be
marked. Industry
has pointed out that while this policy may make enforcement easier, it drives up
the cost of compliance. The NWPCA has proposed that resellers be allowed to
segregate and bundle certified lumber, marking the bundles, rather than each
piece, in two places. The U.S. and Canadian processes are somewhat different.
Canadian companies should contact the appropriate Canadian accreditation
agencies for complete guidelines. 4.) Who is responsible for overseeing the certification program in the United States? The
Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
is responsible for compliance in the U.S. and has turned the certification
process for heat treatment over to the American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC),
a quasi-government standards body for the for the lumber industry. 5.) When do the EU emergency measures take effect? The
EU emergency measures officially went in effect on October 1, 2001. But the
enforcement of the restrictions is left up to the individual member countries.
Thus, some countries may be more flexible than others. European leaders have
indicated that they want the targeted countries to comply as quickly as possible
but do not want this issue to jeopardize normal trade relations. 6.) What treatment methods are allowed for shipments to the EU? The
ALSC, in conjunction with APHIS, has developed standards and a certification
process to ensure compliance with the European requirements. The ALSC and APHIS
have developed a certification program for heat treatment but not for other
treatment methods. Companies can use either fumigation or chemical pressure
impregnation as long they follow the guidelines outlined by the EU. However,
ALSC will not certify these methods as part of its official program. The
U.S. government has developed a mark for pallets treated with fumigation or
chemical pressure impregnation. There is no enforcement authority or
accreditation process through the ALSC for these two marks. However, the EU does
require that a licensed applicator be used. To ensure tracking ability, the
marks require the license number of the fumigator or CPI applicator.
The
National Wooden Pallet & Container Association (NWPCA) has developed a mark
for packaging containing no coniferous lumber. This mark has no enforcement
authority or certification process connected with it. 7.) Will enforcement vary from country to country within the EU? Yes,
although the EU is crafting the emergency standard for Europe, implementation is
left up to each member country. Some European countries, such as Spain and
Germany, will likely be strict when it comes to enforcement whereas France may
be more flexible according to the NWPCA. Port authorities will be required to
make the judgement of what shipments contain coniferous wood packaging. For
lighter looking hardwoods, there may be some confusion depending on how well the
particular customs agent knows the different lumber species. Some shippers may
want to send paperwork with each load to confirm that the packaging is made of
only non-coniferous wood. However, there is no established certification system
to carry this out right now. 8.) What will happen to loads shipped on non-certified coniferous-based solid wood packaging? The
EU has indicated that any coniferous solid wood packaging that does not comply
with the requirements will be refused entry, destroyed or treated to eliminate
the risk of the pinewood nematode prior to entry. This will likely necessitate
the off-loading of any cargo from the packaging and may cause considerable
delay. 9.) What are the differences between the EU emergency measures and the International Standard? Beyond
the emergency measures, international governments are working under the auspices
of the United Nations to develop standards to prevent the spread of pests
through transport packaging. This standard will be voted on at an international
meeting in late March 2002. U.S. government officials expect it will pass and
become the global standard for all countries that are members of the
International Plant Protection Convention. The international standard will cover
both coniferous and non-coniferous solid wood packaging. Implementation will
take place gradually over a 1-3 year period after the international community
adopts the standard. 10.) What are the member sates of the European Union? There
are fifteen member states of the European Union. They are: Austria, Belgium,
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Ireland, The
Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 11.) Will documentation besides the marking of the pallets and lumber be required for movement of solid wood packaging into Europe? No
other documentation will have to accompany the export shipment. The EU emergency
measures require the affected packaging to be marked (stamped, branded, labeled,
etc.) to indicate proper treatment. This is designed to be a paperless system
according to the USDA. Lumber and packaging manufacturing facilities will have
to keep paperwork for the treated lumber. Sawmills and remanufacturing
operations must keep records on the treatment facilities and the shipments of
treated lumber. Packaging manufacturers must be able to show that they received
the appropriate amount of treated lumber for the export packaging produced. 12.) What happens to the pallets, cables, spools, dunnage, crates, etc. currently in use or in inventory? The
EU ha stated that existing pallets and other solid wood packaging must meet the
same requirements as new packaging. Some companies are investigating the option
of purchasing modular heat treatment equipment to handle the problem. Existing
packaging can also be fumigated. 13.) Who should be concerned about the EU emergency measures? Any
company in the U.S., Canada, China or Japan that exports to Europe or supplies
lumber or packaging for European exports should be concerned. 14.) Do Europallets made in Europe but shipped to the U.S. or Canada fall under the EU emergency restrictions? No!
Pallets made in Europe can be turned around and shipped back to Europe without
having to be treated or marked as long as you can verify that the pallet was
made in Europe. Europallets are marked to indicate the country of origin. As
long as the mark indicates that the pallet was made in Europe, the pallet is
exempt from the emergency measure. This may one of your best options to meet the
EU requirements in the short term while U.S. packaging suppliers ramp up for the
new restrictions. Please
keep in mind that printed material may be outdated. Contact the USDA Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service, your certification agency or the NWPCA to be
sure that you have the latest information. Updated: December 15, 2001 |